This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The caption on the new image added today appears to be wrong. The image is not of a skeleton; it's a single fossil. Firsfron of Ronchester 18:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Ah, bad wording on my part, I was going to write something like "reconstruction of the skeleton as it was found. FunkMonk (talk) 18:32, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for rewording the caption. Any idea what part of the critter the fossil belongs to? Firsfron of Ronchester 18:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
It should be the whole thing, you can see the head in the upper left corner. But it makes me wonder whether the fossil was actual that articulated when it was found, but there are no photos of the entire specime in the paper... FunkMonk (talk) 18:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
