Talk:Pania Newton

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cielquiparle in topic Did you know nomination

Date of birth is needed.--2A00:1FA0:824:45D1:0:5E:CAF5:A001 (talk) 15:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 12:55, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

[[File:|140px|Charcoal and chalk pastel sketch of Newton ]]
Charcoal and chalk pastel sketch of Newton
  • ... that New Zealand activist Pania Newton (pictured) gave up a legal career to become an activist and spokesperson for the preservation of her ancestral lands at Ihumātao? Source: "She'd planned to move to Rotorua as soon as she graduated, to join her boyfriend and work at his dad's law firm. But then the survey pegs appeared on the land next door to her village at Ihumātao ... and everything changed." [1]; "The 27-year-old gave up a career in law to work for the preservation of Ihumātao – a 33km piece of Māori ancestral land on the shores of the Manukau Harbour – and she's already taken the cause to the United Nations three times." [2]
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jamie Beaton (entrepreneur)
    • Comment: The sketch is by Wikipedian Pakoire, would be great to see it on the main page. I understand from speaking with a more experienced DYK user that the linked review is OK to use as a QPQ even though the process isn't complete yet (awaiting further review by the OP). Grateful for any suggestions for improvement, to the hook or article. Cheers!

5x expanded by MurielMary (talk), Chocmilk03 (talk), and Pakoire (talk). Nominated by Chocmilk03 (talk) at 06:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC).Reply

  • Comment only Just wondering about the credits as only the submitter has worked on the expansion. The point of the credit is to acknowledge those who have created "new" content (be that for a new article, an expanded article, or achieving GA). Pakoire produced the artwork (ages ago) and MurielMary started the article in 2019. I suggest there should thus be just one credit. Schwede66 20:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
    • @Schwede66: That'd be all good by me! I wasn't sure of the correct approach to credits so took a conservative one. The reason for including MurielMary was that the template instructions have a question mark next to "Author" which says, "If nominating an article created by another editor, change this value", but I did wonder whether that was meant to only apply to the new content. Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
      • Yeah, those instructions aren't at all clear, are they? I've adjusted the credits accordingly. Schwede66 20:56, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Note to reviewer – could this please be considered for International Women's Day on 8 March and moved to the appropriate holding area once approved? Schwede66 22:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Review by Maile
QPQ
  • Done
Eligibility
  • 6603 characters (1104 words) "readable prose size", 5X expansion began January 21
Hooks
  • Stated in the article and sourced
Images
  • Uploaded and freely licensed on Commons by L Maule, "sketch of Pania Newton by L Maule From the adamant, knowledgeable, strong and determined women and girls series"
Copyvio check
  • Looks OK. Earwig's Copyvio Detector picks up on institutional names, etc., that can't be avoided

  Nomination passes. — Maile (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Maile66: Marvellous. Thanks for your review! Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:48, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply