Talk:Panhard 178

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / European / French Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

Literature (Booklet, 48 p) edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

http://www.amazon.de/French-Tanks-World-War-II/dp/1782003924/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1408569881&sr=8-3&keywords=Pascal+Danjou#reader_1782003924

good enough for lit. ? --Neun-x (talk) 21:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

To my disgrace, I must admit that I haven't bought the book yet. Of course in principle anything a distinguished author like Zaloga writes, can be considered a reputable source. However, there shouldn't be too many omissions in, or contradictions with, the present text :o).--MWAK (talk) 08:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic