Talk:Panagiotis Stamatakis/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mychemicalromanceisrealemo (talk · contribs) 15:02, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	No issue. Clear, concise, and cohesive.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Follows all guidelines mentioned. As a minor note, quote boxes are not advised in articles as {{blockquote}} is preferred, but the former is common enough that it's really not a big deal in my opinion. Further, outside of plant cultivars and glosses, double quotation marks should be used rather than single ones (see MOS:SINGLE). Once again, minor (but should be fixed).
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	No issue.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	No issue.
	2c. it contains no original research.	No issue.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No issue.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	No issue.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	No issue.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	No issue.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No issue.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	No issue.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	No issue.
	7. Overall assessment.	Meets all criteria. The only minor issues are the ones described in 1b, however compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style or its subpages is not required for good articles as per WP:GACR.

Will get to this soon.--MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!_{(talk or whatever)} 15:02, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! UndercoverClassicist (talk) 23:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

I've now corrected the MOS:SINGLE errors. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 18:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)