Talk:Pamela Ropner
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Tokyogirl79 in topic Contesting PROD
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Potential usage in classroom? edit
There isn't a lot out there, but I'm finding some stuff that suggests that Ropner's work was used in classrooms at some point in time. A big piece of evidence is this teaching manual and this one. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- There's also evidence here of a Kirkus Review back when they were still a highly respected source. [1] Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:47, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- This also looks to be a review as well. I'm somewhat familiar with the paper and in their day, Books and Bookmen was considered to be a reputable magazine. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:52, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- She's mentioned here, but in what context I'm not sure. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Contesting PROD edit
I'm not happy with the sources here, but I found just enough to where I think she passes notability guidelines. There are reviews and while some of them (namely Kirkus) aren't seen as such a great thing nowadays, they're sources that were seen as highly reliable in their day. If this is to be deleted, it shoudl be through AfD where several editors can debate this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:00, 3 May 2013 (UTC)