Talk:Paleogeography of the India–Asia collision system

University of Hong Kong

• There are some typos (e.g. intracoceanic --> Intraoceanic??)
• More bluelinks could be inserted for geology terms (e.g. calc-alkaline, Cretaceous, Jurassic etc)
• The passage under paleo drainage pattern is pretty long, and without bluelinks. But the illustrations are good enough to explain the text.

--LkwkarenHKU (talk) 16:17, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi Ariel, The article is very organized. Here are some suggestions.

• It would be great if you could explain more how the tectonic process can understand more about the "interaction between the Himalayas orogenic growth and the Asian monsoon system, as well as the dispersal and speciation of faunas".
• It would be great to add several evidence to show that the Tibet plateau is located in the equatorial region, rather than high latitude region.
• It would be great if you could explain how plateau (i.e a large flat highland) can develop via the Mesozoic uplift model

Makhkugeo (talk) 19:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello Ariel,

I like your definitions of the title and the collision onset. They are clear and specific.

There are some suggestions:

• Typos for "hypothese" and "involeves" in the first sentence in the Diachronous collision hypotheses section(?)
• Some references need to be added in the captions of the illustrations.
• Some links can be added for the geological time periods.

--HelenHYW (talk) 17:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

The content is precise and easy to understand, here are some suggestions for you:

• Most figures cannot be seen (it says the files were deleted or moved?)
• Organisation of content isn’t very clear, maybe "Diachronous collision hypotheses" and "Synchronous collision hypothesis" can be put in new sections instead of cramming them under "Timing of collision onset"?
• some spelling mistakes here and there
• “see also” — can separate wikipedia links and external links

--JacqCLSin (talk) 18:13, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Good Topic and easy to understand with good English. Some suggestions are as below: 1. Figures can't be loaded. 2. Some citations are placed before ".", some after, be consistent. 3. Content page looks messy, maybe you should change the type of title you are using. Kenwongtk (talk) 14:00, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Hey Ariel,

Your introduction is clear, which summarises what your page is about :)

Here are some suggestions:

• The photos cannot be seen! It would be much easier to understand the hypotheses if the photos were shown.
• There are a few typos throughout the page. One found in the intro: defferent
• Missing citation for "Detrital zircons from these basins shares same age peaks at 100 Ma." in the section of Detrital zircon age patterns (NW-SE). Citations are also needed for figures if necessary.

Yansytang (talk) 15:03, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Map showing when the Tibet Plateau was elevated

• ... that in the collision of India with Asia, the southern part of the Tibet Plateau achieved its high elevation before the northern part?Mulch, Andreas; Chamberlain, C. Page (2006). "The rise and growth of Tibet". Nature. 439 (7077): 670–671. doi:10.1038/439670a

• Reviewed: Robert Alfred Humble

Moved to mainspace by Hkgeo4869 (talk). Nominated by Graeme Bartlett (talk) at 21:51, 29 November 2019 (UTC).

• @Graeme Bartlett: New enough and plenty long enough, with great infographics. Source mentions "south–north migration of high terrain" and is cited inline. QPQ present. There are several paragraph-ending sentences that do not end in inline citations but need them before I approve this nomination. In most cases, these can probably be solved by additional invocations of existing references:

• "Definition", paragraph 3
• "Paleogene arc-continent collision hypothesis", paragraph 3
• "Synchronous collision hypothesis", paragraph 1
• "Evolution of Tibet's Geomorphology", last paragraph
• "Mesozoic uplift model"
• "Common consensus"
• "Drainage pattern responding to tectonic processes", all paragraphs
• "Evolution of major river systems and their implications"

Please ping me when this issue has been addressed. Raymie (t • c) 00:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review and suggestions Raymie, I have added references to ends of paragraphs as you requested. (and done some copyediting) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:56, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

• Then this article is ready for the main page. Raymie (t • c) 05:17, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

• Hi, I came by to promote this, but several paragraphs lack citations per Rule D2. Yoninah (talk) 13:59, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

• Some extra paragraphs were added since the previous review. I have replicated the relevant references to the other paragraphs. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

• @Raymie and Yoninah: --evrik ^(talk) 21:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

• As of this moment, all paragraphs have citations. Raymie (t • c) 21:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)