Infobox image edit

The article says Despite of its close association with the Pakistan Navy, the Pakistan Marines shares the same military ranks and military codes as of the Pakistan Army. So the infobox image show an officer described as Captain Uzair Khalid which appears to be a naval rank. More confusion the rank braid appears to be that of a Lieutenant. MilborneOne (talk) 07:38, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

That Image doesn't exist now ....--Maxx786 (talk) 11:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Two notes however: Firstly, the appeal to official names is not all that relevant in terms of article naming policy. Secondly, there have been many cut-and-paste move attempts, both to this talk page and the article. The article seems OK, but I've moved the target talk page to Talk:Pakistan Marines/Archive 1 just to be sure we don't lose anything significant, particularly from its history. Possibly unnecessary but harmless. Andrewa (talk) 09:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


Pakistani MarinesPakistan Marines – This page was moved by a user from the real name Pakistan Marines some years back..But the official name is Pakistan Marines as in 1, 2 and 3 Maxx786 (talk) 10:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pakistan Marines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Organization edit

I just removed[1] some content because it appeared to have copied a globalsecurity.org page. 39.33.116.124 (talk) 04:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Strength edit

100,000? There would be more marines than the entire navy, on 11 Mar 2019, I reduced to 10,000, a much more believable number. Although, with the proliferation of Pakistani security forces 100,000 could be possible.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 17:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • On 12:41, 13 March 2019‎ User:Pranav21391 did this "(Pakistan Navy page lists 5000 personnel. Which one is correct? 100,000 is a huge number - References?)"--Degen Earthfast (talk) 17:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • on 3/5/2020 the Infobox states 75,650.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 11;07, 8 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.11.77.202 (talk)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply