Talk:Painting

Article section biased in favor of European Art

Art covers sketching, crafts, drawings, wall carving, stone carving, etc. Although Africa has the world's oldest art, the Wikipedia article lists the painting from the Grotte Chauvet in France first in the history section. This is academic racism. If an article about the history of technology first listed Mac Computers before even mentioning the invention of the Wheel, etc, possibly more editors would see the inherent academic dishonesty. Yes Apple/Mac makes computers, but computers are only one item under the category Technology, similarly, painting is one item under the category art. --2604:2000:DDD1:4900:F85B:9E68:E297:A5F5 (talk) 19:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

While I agree that coverage of African art is poor, we can only go by available sources. The sources say that Grotte Chauvet is the oldest known painting. However, it is incorrect to label that as "European" as no such place existed at that time. The earliest humans in what is now Europe in fact migrated from Africa, so in a sense, the earliest painting is African in origin. freshacconci (✉) 20:15, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Also note that this is an article on a specific form of art i.e. painting not art in the broader sense. So your comment seems a bit off topic here (or to follow your metaphor: why would it be essential to mention the invention of the wheel in an article that limits itself to computers?) The same section, by the way continues, stating that while no older paintings are known, there is older evidence in the form of ochre of the act of painting in Australia predating Chauvet by about 28,000 yrs. Arnoutf (talk) 06:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Painting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080704155609/http://uk.encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761563353/Abstract_Art.html to http://uk.encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761563353/abstract_art.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140730003620/http://www.louvre.fr/en/oeuvre-notices/mona-lisa-%E2%80%93-portrait-lisa-gherardini-wife-francesco-del-giocondo to http://www.louvre.fr/en/oeuvre-notices/mona-lisa-%E2%80%93-portrait-lisa-gherardini-wife-francesco-del-giocondo

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Article claims music is abstract; Is this true?

There is a passage under the heading of "rhythm":

"Music was important to the birth of abstract art since music is abstract by nature—it does not try to represent the exterior world, but expresses in an immediate way the inner feelings of the soul."

How verifiable is this claim? Loopitywoop (talk) 19:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)