Talk:Painted ladies/Archive 1

Archive 1

Capitalization (and "trademarked"???)

Shouldn't this be titled "Painted Ladies" (with a capital 'L')? This is not an article about ladies who are painted. It is the formal name of these six houses. Therefore, by the simple rules of first grade grammar, I would think the 'L' should be capitalized. -- ShinmaWa(talk) 02:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

i tend to agree. unless my english tutoring fails me, 'Painted Ladies' is a proper noun.--emerson7 | Talk 00:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Judging from your sloppy capitalization there (lowercase "i" and "english"), yes, I'd say your tutoring has quite possibly failed you; this is simply not a proper noun. Which brings up another problem: since when is the term "painted ladies" trademarked? WTF? Unless someone can demonstrate that this is the case, the term should be lowercased and the bit about trademarking removed. +ILike2BeAnonymous (talk) 23:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
It is trademarked - Go to the U.S. Patent Office's Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS) and search for either "Painted Ladies" or serial/registration #74100789. I suspect the trademark was done as you can't copyright a book title and so they trademarked the term to prevent its use on knock-off books, calendars, posters, etc. Here's the current data from TESS:
Word Mark PAINTED LADIES
Goods and Services IC 016. US 037 038. G & S: publications, specifically note cards, calendars, and a series of books featuring Victorian houses. FIRST USE: 19780900. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19780900
Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING
Serial Number 74100789
Filing Date September 27, 1990
Current Filing Basis 1A
Original Filing Basis 1A
Published for Opposition September 17, 1991
Registration Number 1667597
Registration Date December 10, 1991
Owner (REGISTRANT) Larsen, Michael INDIVIDUAL UNITED STATES
(REGISTRANT) Elizabeth Pomada INDIVIDUAL UNITED STATES
Attorney of Record Thomas R. Lampe
Type of Mark TRADEMARK
Register PRINCIPAL-2(F)
Affidavit Text SECT 15. SECT 8 (6-YR). SECTION 8(10-YR) 20011024.
Renewal 1ST RENEWAL 20011024
Live/Dead Indicator LIVE
Marc Kupper (talk) (contribs) 17:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Not getting on anyone's side, this is no place to argue and be mean to other users. Kindly suggest a way to improve the article. That is the purpose of this talk page! If you disagree with a suggestion, say so, explain why, and give your own suggestion. As long as your writing is understandable, do not worry about grammar.Yogurtchips (talk) 15:56, 29 December 2009 (UTC)