Talk:Painted Grey Ware culture

Grey

I get "painted" but shouldn't there be some explanation of "grey"? --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 02:10, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

The whole pitch is one-sided in favour of the traditional archaeology of India. Thus, it would be appropriate to add 'of the Gangetic region to the title'. PYule — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.52.187.11 (talk) 20:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Iron Age coexisting with bronze age

Any ratification of this, an Iron Age culture in peacefully co existing with a bronze age culture would be one of a kind.

//Confirmation of this early PGW came when a team of the Archaeological Survey of India led by B.R. Mani and Vinay Kumar Gupta collected charcoal samples from Gosna, a site 6 km east of Mathura across the Yamuna river where two radiocarbon dates from PGW deposit came out to be 2160 BC and 2170 BC.//

From the following link which was used as proof.

[19] http://www.academia.edu/7025503/Early_Settlement_of_Mathura_An_Archaeological_Perspective_An_Occasional_paper_published_by_Nehru_Memorial_Museum_and_Library_N._Delhi

//P.G.W.period’s deposit came out to be 2150 ± 150 B.C. and 2160 ±//

//Painted Grey Ware: It is a deluxe kind of grey ware pottery with designs in black painting, generally found from archaeological sites in Western Uttar Pradesh, Eastern Rajasthan,Haryana and Punjab. It is a demarcating pottery for a period which is generally assigned between 1200 B.C. to 500 B.C.// 122.176.170.215 (talk) 22:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

References

I noticed a number of references using the url to a Google Book link. I though editors might be interested in a tool which takes a link as input and creates a (usually) properly formatted ref.

Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books

I used it to improve two such references.

It really helps creates a much cleaner list of references. I hope you will try it. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Painted Grey Ware culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060908052851/http://pubweb.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp/indus/english/3_1_07.html to http://pubweb.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp/indus/english/3_1_07.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140101140624/http://a.harappa.com/sites/g/files/g65461/f/CulturesSocietiesIndusTrad.pdf to http://a.harappa.com/sites/g/files/g65461/f/CulturesSocietiesIndusTrad.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130523094912/http://www.ejvs.laurasianacademy.com/ejvs0703/ejvs0703article.pdf to http://www.ejvs.laurasianacademy.com/ejvs0703/ejvs0703article.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060908052851/http://pubweb.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp/indus/english/3_1_07.html to http://pubweb.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp/indus/english/3_1_07.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

iron age?

this article claims an "iron age" but doesn't desribe anything that was made from iron? that just doesn't make sense. 2603:8001:9500:9E98:0:0:0:9A7 (talk) 07:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)