Talk:Pacific Airlines

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Usernamekiran in topic Requested move 2 August 2020

Jetstar Pacific or Jetstar Pacific Airlines?? edit

From Jetstar Pacific website, they have never used Jetstar Pacific Airlines. I believe this article should be moved to Jetstar Pacific --Zack2007 (talk) 10:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

-> We use this in accordance to their sister airlines, Jetstar Asia Airways. The name of that article is "Jetstar Asia Aiways", not "Jetstar Asia", although they always use "Jetstar Asia" as their trading name, not "Jetstar Asia Airways". Some said that it is due to the official company name, which is "Jetstar Asia Airways Private Limited". For this airline, the official company name is "Jetstar Pacific Airlines Joint Stock Aviation Company", so the same thing should applies as well. So, we have 3 sister airlines whose name we use are, "Jetstar Airways", "Jetstar Asia Airways", and "Jetstar Pacific Airlines". Caytruc (talk) 10:34, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

-> In addition, for all ticket offices and travel agents of "Jetstar Pacific" in Vietnam, they all use the banner "Jetstar Pacific Airlines". Actually, the 3 "Jetstar" sister airlines use the single brand name, which is "Jetstar" only, but when it comes to differentiate, they add the word "Airways" or "Airlines". Caytruc (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

-> In addition, for all emails sent from this airline to customers, it is titled in the "From" as "Jetstar Pacific Airlines", not "Jetstar Pacific". Caytruc (talk) 03:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Jetstar Logo.svg edit

The image Image:Jetstar Logo.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 22 external links on Jetstar Pacific. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Jetstar Pacific to Pacific Airlines edit

As of 29 July 2020, the ticketing system has been migrated from Jetstar Pacific’s website (www.jetstar.com) to Pacific Airlines website (www.pacificairlines.com.vn), so I think this page should have major changes like the article title, the website... And I would like someone to make the .svg file for the new logo. Thank you.

  Done Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 20:21, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 2 August 2020 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply



Pacific Airlines (Vietnam)Pacific Airlines – Primary topic, no other Pacific Airlines. Suggested name is a redirect to this article. Kointrun (talk) 07:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 02:46, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Relisting. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 03:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disagree, we already have an article named Pacific Air Lines, which is very similar so many may get confused between two. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 08:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Support I agree with the user above that readers can easily mix up the two subjects. However, we have two articles with similar names, one of which is certainly called this title and one of which is certainly not. The most effective solution would be to make the base page the topic that actually has that name, with a hatnote up top directing users who are looking for the similar one. The base name is already directing to this page anyway.--Yaksar (let's chat) 15:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Comment I have relisted one last time to establish a clear consensus. Regards Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:37, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Definitely do something, having Pacific Airlines be a primary redirect to Pacific Airlines (Vietnam) is unacceptable. Either move as proposed or turn Pacific Airlines into a disambiguation page. -- King of ♥ 03:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • I certainly agree there should be a move, but I would strongly oppose the latter option. At least at the current setup users searching Pacific Airlines without a space are brought to the only topic at that name. This is the perfect example of where a hatnote is useful -- to direct readers to a similarly but unquestionably differently named topic -- rather than sending users through a second page first.--Yaksar (let's chat) 14:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Support as proposed. I'm pretty sure that our much-maligned SMALLDETAILS remains policy, meaning there is no actual competition for the primary topic claim. The current disaster of a title cannot stand, certainly, with the base name redirecting here. Red Slash 21:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Persuaded by the livery, which defeats any RECOGNIZABILTY need for the parenthetical. SMALLDETAILS has limits, but Pacific Air Lines is sufficiently different. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.