Talk:PREDA Foundation

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Headline text

ive just started this page on Preda, ill develop it over the next few days. This article is about a Charity, not a business. ive seadchec around wikipedia and theres are hundreds of articles about different charities around the world so I thought it would be good to add this charity. Ill add all citations, resources, etc as i complete the article, thankyouSusanbryce 16:44, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

OK, Im still building the article, but I feel ive already put together the foundation of a good solid article here on this charity. Ive made sure to put high quality citations for the article, I added the Preda official homepage in the external links. ive listed the goals of the charity, its history, information on its founders, a number of charitable projects Preda is involved with, and its awards. If I could get some feedback from others it would be much appreciated, kind regards.Susanbryce 17:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Susan,

You have made a good start. It is a well referenced report. If you could find a few more sources, that would be good but it is a good article. Capitalistroadster 23:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

This article was nominated for speedy deletion as spam. The article is well referenced and does not meet the criterion for speedy deletion. If the nominator still wishes to seek the deletion of the article, it should be through Articles for Deletion. Capitalistroadster 23:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou Capitalistroadster for your input, much appreciated, regardsSusanbryce 13:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Concerns relating to our neutrality and living persons policies

I had to remove what was an obvious and slanderous attack from this page. People need to follow the rules of wikipedia and refrain from personal slanderous attacksSusanbryce 13:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

sorry susan. i think you need to look up the definition of slander. slander is not true. accusing me of being a vandal would be a good example of slander. removing documented facts from the article is not. my true statement is supported by facts. if you are going to list a person's history here i dont see any reason why it should only include the good things they have done and not include the bad things. this is about facts. not advertising.RodentofDeath 08:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

If someone has been accused of a crime and later all the charges were dismissed, it isn't acceptable to merely say they were charged or accused, we must give balanced coverage in accordance with our policies on neutrality and living persons. Addhoc 09:48, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

ok, adhoc. i have no problem with that as long as it is done consistently. considering the extremely low numbers of convictions then i will assume that the article on wikipedia titled "human trafficking in angeles city" will likewise be deleted.

Shouldn't it be PREDA, allcaps?

If the name means People’s Recovery Empowerment Development Assistance, shouldn't it PREDA Foundation instead of Preda Foundation? / edgarde 01:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Good point. I'll try to move this article and then create the needed redirect.DONE!!! --- Tito Pao 01:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Creator deserves an article?

Does anybody agree that an article should be made for Fr. Shay Cullen, if he made the group and was nominated for a nobel peace prize three times? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.43.200 (talk) 03:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on PREDA Foundation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929102837/http://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/San/public/%7B7B62844A-267E-4E9A-82F9-224DC2FDA3E8%7D/09threportinquiryintoprostitutionfinalreportpt1/09threportinquiryintoprostitutionfinalreportpt1/html/09threportinquiryintoprostitutionfinalreportpt1_39.htm to http://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/San/public/%7B7B62844A-267E-4E9A-82F9-224DC2FDA3E8%7D/09threportinquiryintoprostitutionfinalreportpt1/09threportinquiryintoprostitutionfinalreportpt1/html/09threportinquiryintoprostitutionfinalreportpt1_39.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030504090802/http://www.ips.fi/koulut/199742/6.htm to http://www.ips.fi/koulut/199742/6.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090823022442/http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/pam/2007/01/10/news/36.street.kids.rounded.up.html to http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/pam/2007/01/10/news/36.street.kids.rounded.up.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070722135606/http://feminism.eserver.org/prostitution.txt to http://feminism.eserver.org/prostitution.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)