Talk:POMZ

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

I think we should probably remove the arming/disarming procedures, it's more how to information than encyclopedic information - i.e. WP:NOT. What do other people think ? Megapixie 13:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Remove this information. I have already removed similar information from other mines articles on the grounds that they are "how to" section as per WP:NOT. --Deon Steyn 07:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Okay - I did. It's the in history if anyone's interested. Megapixie 23:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

POMZ

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Does anyone have any information about the original POMZ mine ? All my sources only mention it in passing without any details. I have an old intelligence bulletin (Korean War era) that has a unamed North Korean mine that's basically a piece of thick iron pipe with notches cut into the exterior and a cap welded over the end, I would imagine the original POMZ would be something like this. Megapixie 23:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic