Talk:PMC-Sierra/Archives/2014
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Ashley Pomeroy in topic Neutrality?
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Corporate Restructuring Vandalism
Corporate restructuring information needs to have an external citation for it be included otherwise it is non-verifiable. No one can or will argue with information that is available in the public domain (with the citation to prove it). But posting information as facts with no basis is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you are an employee posting information that is only available to an "insider" of the company, that too is a violation (and probably a violation of your employment contract). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.63.194 (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Neutrality?
Coming from a shareholder in PMC this article seems written like an investor relations sheet. 68.41.154.157 (talk) 19:00, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- I hope you didn't buy shares in mid-2000. They were $240 or so at the height of the dot.com boom, $6 now. PMC wasn't really a notable dot.com failure (it's still going) but it had a particularly spectacular dot.com-propelled share price ride. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:47, 22 January 2014 (UTC)