Talk:Pétrus (restaurant)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 16:22, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

General

• No issues with the reliability of sources
• No issues with imaging
• One dab link
• No dead links

Lead

• "It is now in it's third location" → "It is now in its third location"
• You could accommodate the origin of its name in the lead.

Reception

• "The restaurant won it's first Michelin star" → "The restaurant won its first Michelin star"
• "She found issues with some of the dishes, such as a mackerel which wasn't properly filleted, and some overcooked samphire." needs ref
• 'The' in 'The Evening Standard' is redundant, and should be italicised – Lemonade51 (talk) 20:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

On hold, no issues with imaging and sourcing. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 20:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

• I've made the fixes as appropriate, thanks for the review. Miyagawa (talk) 09:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by Blofeld

The lead needs expansion with some info about what sort of cuisine it specializes in and the reception summary. Although it isn't appropriate to reel off a menu as such, I would like to see a bit more coverage of its cuisine.♦ Dr. Blofeld 23:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

I'll draw together a couple of paragraphs today based on the description of the menu in the more recent reviews. Miyagawa (talk) 09:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

I've added a couple of paragraphs about the menu. Miyagawa (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC)