Talk:Outline of sharks

Outlines High‑importance

	This article is an outline, a type of article that presents a list of articles or sub-topics related to its subject in a hierarchical form. For the standardized set of outlines on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines. Outlines are within the scope of WikiProject Outlines, a collaborative effort to improve outlines on Wikipedia. For guidance on building and maintaining outlines, see Wikipedia:Outlines.OutlinesWikipedia:WikiProject OutlinesTemplate:WikiProject OutlinesOutlines articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sharks Top‑importance

	Sharks portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sharks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sharks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SharksWikipedia:WikiProject SharksTemplate:WikiProject Sharksshark articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge request Outline of sharks with Shark edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Here User: Mgiganteus1 should have argued why he thinks why they should be merged, since he did not do that I will argue why they should not be merged:

Not merge: See WP:OLWHY, It states: "Outlines are a form of list, and lists are easier and faster to browse than the text (prose) in articles. Links take longer to identify and click on in articles (they're spread out more). Articles are intended for explaining, while outlines are a type of tree structure optimized for navigating and depicting taxonomic information rapidly. Outlines are more effective at covering the entire scope of a subject, and outlines are not limited by the size restrictions that the see also sections of articles are. It is awkward to present as many links in an article, and embedded links tend to be arranged much more chaotically or even randomly throughout an article's prose. The links in an outline are much more organized for ease of understanding.

In addition to being a type of article, outlines are also an important part of Wikipedia's contents system, and serve as tables of contents or site maps for their respective subjects." --Stefan ^talk 05:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

7 days, no comment, I will remove the merge request. --Stefan ^talk 01:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not merge: As with Stefan, correct placement in accordance with the other outlines on wikipedia Highfields (talk, contribs, review) 12:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Do not merge - Outline of sharks is a useful addition to Wikipedia's Outline of knowledge, one of Wikipedia's key navigation systems. The OOK suffers if you dismantle it with merges. Let it grow! The Transhumanist 01:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

essence of sharks is a rather non-encyclopedic subject, perhaps it should be renamed or split into multiple sections —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.112.112.121 (talk) 07:19, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

renamed section The Transhumanist 20:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:PhiladelphiaInquirerJuly151916.gif Nominated for Deletion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image used in this article, File:PhiladelphiaInquirerJuly151916.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 11 April 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:PhiladelphiaInquirerJuly151916.gif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation. The Transhumanist 00:09, 9 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic