This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Outdoor Research article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Backpacking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BackpackingWikipedia:WikiProject BackpackingTemplate:WikiProject BackpackingBackpacking articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Article is not encyclopedic in nature, reads as a promotional advertisement similar to their website story, propose speedy-deletion. Only the first paragraph in the first section seems relevant. Propose to delete everything below it.Everestrecords (talk) 09:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Whilst you are welcome to make changes to the article, I'm afraid that it does not qualify as a candidate for speedy deletion, which requires that an article meet extremely strict criteria. I have therefore removed the speedy deletion request from this page. If you feel that the current tone is too promotional (it's certainly too discursive, and contains a number of peacock statements) then by all means edit it to make the necessary improvements. Yunshui雲水 10:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your advise. I thought the first paragraph is the only encyclopedic content, and removed the rest, which was mainly advertisement and marketing. I left their 3 webpages/websites, which provide all of the advertisement content, and history-advertisement, and product information. Unfortunate so many companies use an encyclopedia for advertising. Most get away with it because no one takes the time to hold them accountable. Having their 3 websites listed is more than enough, along with their wikipedia listing and brief history.Everestrecords (talk) 07:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
The company sponsors a mountaineer who was recently revealed by Outside Magazine to have drug-doped for his 2010 and 2012 Mt. Everest climbs. [[1]] 13 paragraph from the bottom. The mountaineer is readily listed on many of their webpages as a sponsored mountaineer. Will consider adding this as a kind of "controversy" section to the main article, eg, Outdoor Research has sponsored a mountaineer who was revealed by Outside Magazine to engage in drug-doping for his Mt. Everest without-supplemental-oxygen climbing attempts.Everestrecords (talk) 07:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
