A table of contents is not encyclopedic content. Better to discuss the book. But perhaps this is just an outline in the process of development? DGG (talk) 02:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes and no. Someone should do that. I don't plan to, but I might at some point. If you like to delete anything that isn't perfect, rather than wait for the wiki process to improve it, I won't edit battle you over it. Ask yourself : is the article better with it or without it, rather than asking yourself could it be better and if it can therefore should I delete it. I think as it stands it gives a reader a good overview of the contents. It is a very interesting book by a very interesting person. I'm one third the way through reading it now. WAS 4.250 (talk) 15:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
