Talk:Our Lady of Peñafrancia
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
File:Penafrancia-naga.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion edit
|
An image used in this article, File:Penafrancia-naga.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:14, 31 August 2011 (UTC) |
Sourcing and tone concerns edit
Hello. I am concerned about the sourcing of this article. Three "References" were provided with zero footnotes. It turns out that two of the references were Blogspot blogs, and do not meet our criteria for reliability. Furthermore, one of them had verbatim paragraphs copied from this article (the blog was published in September 2016, and the edits to this article predated that publication.) So I have removed those links from the article. But even with a comprehensive PDF from a local high school, we still have the problem of zero footnotes. Now much of the narrative in this article is fanciful and uses an unencyclopedic tone. It is apparently written by devotees. So this is not suitable for Wikipedia's standards. The article needs to be reduced to verifiable facts and the tone needs to be impartial and non-judgemental. I haven't touched the article prose yet, because frankly I'm tempted to begin deleting large swaths of it... hopefully it can be salvaged less destructively. But we'll need sources. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 18:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:53, 24 September 2021 (UTC)