Talk:Oumare Tounkara

Oumare Tounkara has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 1, 2018. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Football: England / France Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the French football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Oumare Tounkara/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 19:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'll take this one, will post review in the next day or so. Kosack (talk) 19:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Initial review:

Lead edit

Ligue 2 is fully professional, so I would change the opening to French professional footballer.
Link League One.

Sunderland edit

Link friendly to Exhibition game.
Last sentence of first paragraph is unsourced.
"to complete an unlikely comeback"- what would be considered a likely comeback? Perhaps late would be more suitable?

Stevenage edit

Unlink League One, already linked previously.
Link Conference Premier.

Honours edit

Section is unsourced.

Career statistics edit

In the table, you have combined totals of unrelated spells, for example Bristol Rovers, Stevenage and Grimsby are combined into a single total and also Drancy and Chateauroux are combined. Is there a reason for this? Normally stats tables have total rows for more than one season at a single club.

References edit

Refs 3 and 14 from the Sunderland website are dead links, any chance of recovering them?
Refs 25, 30, 31 and 32 from The Post are also gone.
Refs 36 and 37 need an author.

Not too much really, a highly polished article with a handful of minor quibbles. Kosack (talk) 14:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing the article, Kosack. Have made all of the above changes. You're quite right about the career statistics table so that's been changed too. Let me know if there's anything else. Cheers. SBFCEdit (talk) 14:42, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@SBFCEdit: Nice work, one further thing, ref 16 appears to have gone dead as well. Once that's sorted, I think this one is ready for promotion. Kosack (talk) 19:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Kosack: All sorted now. Cheers. SBFCEdit (talk) 19:46, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Happy to promote this, meets the necessary GA criteria. Kosack (talk) 19:56, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic