Talk:Ottoman–Habsburg War (1529–1533)
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Requested move 2 September 2024
edit
 | It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
- Ottoman–Habsburg War (1529–1533) → Ottoman–Habsburg War of 1529–1533
- Ottoman–Habsburg War (1540–1547) → Ottoman–Habsburg War of 1540–1547
- Ottoman–Habsburg War (1551–1562) → Ottoman–Habsburg War of 1551–1562
- Ottoman–Habsburg War (1565–1568) → Ottoman–Habsburg War of 1565–1568
– WP:NATURALDIS. Disambiguation is fundamentally necessary to the identification of these wars. They are described as distinct Ottoman–Habsburg wars within a series of wars, not periods of time within a single war (e.g., contrast with History of Canada (1960–1981) as mentioned at WP:NCDURATION). I suspect there are many other generically-named wars (and other subjects) that might benefit from similar treatment. I am also tempted to suggest lowercasing of "War", but that might be a distraction. — BarrelProof (talk) 19:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Lowercase war per usage stats, even if it's a distraction. Neutral on which disambig style to use, since it's not uncommon to call separate things the same name and use parenthetic disambig. Dicklyon (talk) 00:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Another issue is whether it should be "Habsburg–Ottoman" (i.e., alphabetical order), as at Habsburg–Ottoman War. —Srnec (talk) 01:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, let's do that. It's conventional on WP, and somewhat more common in sources to put Habsburg first. And let's fix that disambig page capitalization while we're at it. Dicklyon (talk) 03:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)