Talk:Other effective area-based conservation measures
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Clayoquot in topic Qualifying for a Wikipedia article
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Qualifying for a Wikipedia article
editHi Pichemist. I'm writing in response to your comment:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
I have no relationship to Allilpritchard, the creator of this draft; I'm just another AfC reviewer like you. I am perplexed that you find the sources to be lacking. The following three sources cited in the article appear to easily meet all four criteria:
- Dudley, Nigel; Jonas, Holly; Nelson, Fred; Parrish, Jeffrey; Pyhälä, Aili; Stolton, Sue; Watson, James E. M. (2018-07-01). "The essential role of other effective area-based conservation measures in achieving big bold conservation targets". Global Ecology and Conservation. 15: e00424. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00424. ISSN 2351-9894.</ref><ref name=":0">Alves-Pinto, Helena; Geldmann, Jonas; Jonas, Harry; Maioli, Veronica; Balmford, Andrew; Ewa Latawiec, Agnieszka; Crouzeilles, Renato; Strassburg, Bernardo (2021-04-01). "Opportunities and challenges of other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) for biodiversity conservation". Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation. 19 (2): 115–120. doi:10.1016/j.pecon.2021.01.004. ISSN 2530-0644.
- International Union for Conservation of Nature "IUCN Guidelines for Recognising and reporting OECMs"
- "OECM concept may bring more inclusive approach to conserving biodiversity". Mongabay Environmental News. 2021-09-13. Retrieved 2022-10-11.
Best, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 21:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Ah thank you, my mistake. I believe that I was attempting to flag it under "v" rather than "nn". Altough after going trough the article once again just now I do think that it should have made it into article space... My mistake.. I'll accept it now. I appreciate the heads up and I ask you only to bear with me as I have not been an AfC reviewer for long. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 21:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! Take care, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 21:31, 1 January 2023 (UTC)