Talk:Ossian's Ride

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Restored Henry Farrel's review

Latest comment: 3 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

It is significant. Correctly presented as opinion rather than fact. But maybe an opinion that sounds uncomfortably true for some people. GwydionM (talk) 07:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please be advised that after going on this person's profile and clicking some links it becomes clear that this person is a far right, pro ukraine invasion conspiracy theorist. 2A02:C7C:7025:B500:24E4:684F:1A5F:4066 (talk) 15:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Someone is pig-ignorant and sloppy. But since I was told off for insisting that China did not annex Tibet by enforcing its universally accepted sovereign rights, I have given up expecting fairness. Keep your libertarian biases: in the end it will get you replaced by the sort of thing you hate. An official tax-funded alternative.--GwydionM (talk) 11:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

who cares...

Latest comment: 11 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

.... what this bloke who hides inside a plastic bag thinks of this book?

I hereby question the relevance. there are surely other reviews by people better qualified... if we must have a section about reviews. it's not even that I disagree with his assessment- that's neither here nor there- but he's hardly the TLS, is he?

duncanrmi (talk) 22:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic