Talk:Orton on the Hill

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 11 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Orton-on-the-Hill. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 11 December 2022 edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Tol (talk | contribs) @ 00:27, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orton on the Hill → Orton-on-the-Hill – Per Ordnance Survey and most other sources such as Google Maps. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:40, 11 December 2022 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Polyamorph (talk) 19:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:09, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. Ordnance Survey and Google Maps are not reliable sources on spelling of names. Note that the correct spelling without hyphens can be clearly seen in the picture of the village sign on the page. The Orton and Twycross History page, used as a reference and also given as an external link, also spells the name correctly. I think a local history source and a local sign-maker are more likely to know how to spell a name than a remote map-making agency. --188.30.210.215 (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oppose: From the evidence of a quick web search it appears both forms are well used, so don't see any reason to change. Maybe add a note on the hyphenated form? YorkshireExpat (talk) 17:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oppose: per name sign, see article. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic