Talk:Orlík (band)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article contains a translation of Orlík (hudební skupina) from cs.wikipedia. |
Regarding Categories edit
I question Orlík's placement in the "Neo-Nazi music" category. There is a pretty big difference between racism and Nazism, and based on my limited knowledge of the group I would place them in the former. "Limited" being the key word there, I'm not going to edit the page, but I thought I'd raise the question. I've never seen an English translation of their lyrics nor do I speak a word of Czech, so I'm rather curious to know if they make any pro-Nazi statements or are just racist of their own accord.
- I, too, think that calling Orlík to be a Neo-Nazi group is too much. They were obviously nationalists, but they were also opposed to (namely German) nacism/fascism (see e.g. the Faschos song). In the time Orlík existed, the punk/skinhead movements were, in fact, quite united (see Oi!), so I think calling them Neo-Nazis would be wrong. (I believe the categorization of Daniel Landa as a Neo-Nazi is wrong, too. In fact, I think the Neo-Nazi category is a POV by its name.) --Mormegil 14:55, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Orlik-oi.jpg edit
Image:Orlik-oi.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)