The page appears written like an advertisement edit

Especially under the features section WittyWidi (talk) 06:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Agree.
In its current form, the article is not suitable as a Wikipedia article.
The whole article including the introduction is problematic, but I agree that the Features section stands out.
I note the conflict of interest warning, which also isn't a positive indication.
The comment by @WittyWidi was added 1 month ago, it hasn't resulted in an improvement yet, and there's no objection to the discussion post or advertisment warning.
Most of the sources are 1st party sources and hence don't meet the guidelines.
Most non-bot edits the last 3 years are IP-edits. I randomly checked 7 or so of the corresponding IP users, of those 1 seemed to be a legit user, the other had only made edits to this page, or only to this page and other product pages, and a few had a history of blocks and alleged commercial interests for edits on other pages.
I'm removing the Features section for now. If we see no improvement of the article in reasonable time, it should be considered for deletion. Ekborg (talk) 23:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply