Talk:Organization XIII/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Result: Keep GamerPro64 (talk) 16:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Two years ago, this article would be a Good Article. Now, it has problems to it. Problems include"

• Both pictures fail criteria 6a.
• The article has a in universe tag to it.
• And there is possibly some unreferenced stuff in article.

If these problems arn't fixed in a week, it loses its statis. GamerPro64 (talk) 21:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Man this article has fallen apart. I'll start working on the prose, trimming excess details and adding citations as needed.

Gamer- What about the first image fails NFCC? I don't see much need for the second image anymore. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 22:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC))

The only problem with the image I see is where'd it come from? I think the universe tag is partially my fault. Should've written a merchandise section last Thanksgiving. ~Itzjustdrama ^{? C} 23:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

No worries about that. I think it refers more to the excessive plot details in the Members section. The lack or addition of a merchandise section wouldn't fix poorly written plot summaries. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 14:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC))

I started making edits to the prose and adding some citations. Let me know if these are on the right track.
Also, I may need an extension; the article proved to be worse off than I anticipated and I'm busier than I thought I would be today. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 17:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC))

O.k, I'll add another week to this. But that's it. After the 23, I will delist the article. GamerPro64 (talk) 01:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Much appreciated. I doubt this should take more than a day or two extra. I'll notify you once I've finished. Thank you very much. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 01:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC))

Copy edits have been made to address the in-universe issue; over 14KB of prose and excess game dialogue citations have been trimmed. The editor (TheRedPenOfDoom) that added the in-universe tag also agrees and has removed the tag.

The only issue left is that some content, particularly related to the plot in Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days, is unsourced. I added a source for one part, but haven't found too much. Should they be removed until citations can be found? (Guyinblack25 ^talk 14:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC))

Maybe. But all and all, I will keep the article since most of the problem are resolved and I'm positive you will take care of the Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days problems. GamerPro64 (talk) 16:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Much appreciated. I'll be sure to cite the info when some source become available. The game should be released in North America this summer, so some sources are sure to pop up soon. Thanks. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 16:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC))