This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The recitation of the facts is incomplete. It completely leaves out the part where Bradshaw confessed to the crime, which is the entire reason the case was up on appeal to begin with. 98.235.32.78 (talk) 06:05, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Indeed, the section is somewhat confusing. Something important (e.g. his confession) must have happened after he asked the police "What is going to happen to me now?". Otherwise, it is completely unclear what is the significance of this question. Tagged inline now. GregorB (talk) 14:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
