Talk:Oregon Bicycle Racing Association

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

former members

Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

If we're going to include a list of notable former members, there need to be clear criteria for what establishes sufficient notability. In the absence of any other standard, existence of WP articles is what we need to fall back on. (Unless someone believes that we should include all former members...) -Pete (talk) 05:27, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Since there's a dispute about whether the full list should be included, I went ahead and Wikilinked all the entries. I'm stashing the ones with els here to be used as refs for writing the needed articles. I suppose we should have a statute of limitations for how long we wait before the redlinks are removed? Katr67 (talk) 18:35, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for doing all that Katr. The redlinks can be removed at any time by anyone who thinks they don't belong, but I'm personally willing to wait a week or so before doing anything like that. -Pete (talk) 18:38, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

p.s. Pretty sure a lot of the NON-red links are pointing to similarly-named people who are actually not former OBRA members. -Pete (talk) 18:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fixed Katr67 (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Members with external links

File:Alpenrose.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image used in this article, File:Alpenrose.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Alpenrose.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic