A fact from Ordish–Lefeuvre system appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 June 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm a structural engineer but never heard of the Ordish–Lefeuvre system until today. However, the claim that only two bridges have used this system ignores the Brooklyn Bridge. Isn't it the same system? While the article defines the O-L as a parabolic cable connecting only at the centerline otherwise with stays, the BB has a catenary same as other suspension bridges, but was also originally designed and built with stays (sufficient to carry the dead load if the cables failed). Shouldn't the article discuss the BB also? Cscawthorn (talk) 16:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
