 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Is there a reason this was categorized under "obsolete biological theories"? I don't see what this has to do with biology in any way. Removed that category XinaNicole (talk) 07:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
FreeatlastChitchat edit
- @FreeatlastChitchat, I will point you to WP:BRD, WP:TALKDONTREVERT, and WP:EW. Stop reverting justified deletions arbitrarily.
- The sourcing is there, why are you removing sourced content? FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- As per NPOV. Use neutral 3rd party sources only please. Thanks Code16 (talk) 03:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- The source is a third party source lol. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- @FreeatlastChitchat: this source is unreliable and WP:PEACOCK.--Human3015Send WikiLove 05:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- The source is a third party source lol. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- As per NPOV. Use neutral 3rd party sources only please. Thanks Code16 (talk) 03:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
My name Sam edit
Hi How are you I need to help 91.74.225.203 (talk) 00:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Please edit
Please I'm waiting 91.74.225.203 (talk) 00:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)