Talk:Orders of magnitude (luminous flux)
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 October 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Having trouble filling in orders between Luxor spotlight and stuff like stars. edit
I'm having trouble locating luminosity ratings on high-powered lasers. There's a big gap between 10^9 (Luxor) and 10^24 lumens (dimmest red dwarf stars). Anybody out there with laser experience? 72.241.44.72 (talk) 15:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Addendum: Sent request to National Ignition Facility via their contact form for specs on their 500 TW combined laser shots, as reported via Fox News and other outlets in July 2012. I'm not sure if I have enough info to calculate the luminous flux of those shots. 72.241.44.72 (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Sun edit
The source cited[1] for the Sun's luminous flux gives the Sun's power output, but it does not give a luminous efficacy, or a luminous flux.--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 00:43, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- I added a reference from the article Luminous efficacy. — Edgar.bonet (talk) 14:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Orders of magnitude (luminous flux). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081014010312/http://www.energyfederation.org:80/consumer/default.php/cPath/25_44_784 to http://www.energyfederation.org/consumer/default.php/cPath/25_44_784
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- Original link is indeed broken. Could not find a new URL to the same page with Google nor through the energyfederation.org's own search engine. Archive page is fine. — Edgar.bonet (talk) 15:46, 4 July 2016 (UTC)