Talk:Orange-headed tanager
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Jens Lallensack in topic GA Review
 | Orange-headed tanager has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 7, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Orange-headed tanager/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 22:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Reading soon. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- upperparts – not explained in linked article, link to Birdgloss instead?
- Replaced all links to upperparts and underparts with birdgloss.
- No this does not work, you need to use the template as explained in Talk:Glossary of bird terms. And there is still one link to the anatomy article left (that still does not work). --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Added the links, using the bird gloss template this time.
- No this does not work, you need to use the template as explained in Talk:Glossary of bird terms. And there is still one link to the anatomy article left (that still does not work). --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Replaced all links to upperparts and underparts with birdgloss.
- Females are similar, but are duller. – Maybe "Femals are similar but duller"?
- Done.
- generic name – link
- Reworded instead, no good target.
- Rewording is ok, maybe even better, but you could have used Generic name (biology). --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reworded instead, no good target.
- In the main text you link some country names but not others (e.g., Bolivia, Brazil)
- Per MOS:OVERLINKING, I've tried to avoid linking countries that everybody is likely to know (Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela), but linked the rest.
- It's a minor thing and completely your call, but I'm confused that "Venezuela" is more well-known than, e.g., "Peru"? My intuition would be the other way around. Not being consistent here has slightly confused me. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Well, imo, Venezuela is pretty well-known due to its status as a major oil producer, as well as its economic crisis. The other countries are very well-known outside of the Americas. It isn't a big deal, I could link Venezuela as well if you want.
- It's a minor thing and completely your call, but I'm confused that "Venezuela" is more well-known than, e.g., "Peru"? My intuition would be the other way around. Not being consistent here has slightly confused me. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Per MOS:OVERLINKING, I've tried to avoid linking countries that everybody is likely to know (Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela), but linked the rest.
- less extensive yellow on the head, – Do you possibly mean "intensive", or is the yellow area indeed smaller in females?
- Extensive is correct.
- Do you know if the shown photographs show males or females?
- No.
- nest about 2 m (6.6 ft) after the ground. – "over"?
- Replaced with above.
- What about vocalisations? --Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- The taxonbox mentions "Nemosia chrysopis" as a synonym, but not the main text. Mention that the subspecies was once considered a species of its own? Also, this name needs a redirect.
- Created redirects, and added bit to subspecies section.
- Link "crowns" (to birdgloss?) --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Closing note: Thanks for the fixes, looks all good now. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 12:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)