This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
please anybody out there knew the relationship between bajau sama and orang laut of riau?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.165.1 (talk) 07:42, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The article Urak Lawoi says another name for that group is Orang laut, and looking at book sources this seems to be true, or at least Urak Lawoi is a northern sub-group of Orang laut. I think the pages would be best merged rather than discussing the same group twice. Fences&Windows 01:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oppose There are lots of people called Orang Laut. You could just as easily argue that it should be merged with Aboriginal Malay. — kwami (talk) 06:17, 22 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Urak Lawoi are a ethnic sub-group of the Orang Laut, as well as the Duano. Although a merger would be possible, it is also not wrong to leave the article.
A wrong statement however is, that it is an alternative name for Orang Laut.
The reference is page 327 of Clifford Sather: The Bajau Laut - Adaption, History, And Fate In A Maritime Fishing Society Of South-Eastern Sabah, Oxford University Press, Kuala Lumpur, 1997, ISBN983-56-0015-5; --cefalon 15:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cccefalon (talk • contribs)
Add "Orang Laut" literally translates as "Sea People"?edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I think would make clearer the relationship of the people to the sea. "Seafaring people" doesn't fully describe these people since Danes are also often described as seafaring people, but that's very different.
"Sea People" or "People of the Sea"? Antifesto (talk) 20:26, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
In the literal sense, it's "Sea people". But "People of the Sea" is isn't wrong either. It's just weird or maybe over-dramatic to describe a person's ethnicity as such. Not too sure if it's anthropologically valid. -Jeblat (talk) 13:45, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply