Talk:Opus Dei/Archive 2011

Archive 2005

←

Archive 2009

Archive 2010

Archive 2011

Opus Dei in popular culture

The body of this section is only and only about The Da vinci code, which does not justify a full blown title like "in popular culture".
I added a few more examples of some pop culture references to Opus Dei. I just got finished watching Breach, and I read The Genesis Code a few years back. Hopefully this fleshes out the topic a little. Still a little confused as to why the main article cited is Criticisms of the DaVinci Code -- that seems a little strange for a pop culture section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.104.31.88 (talk) 06:20, 4 August 2007

Secondly the novel is "villainified" in this section as being a work of history, see second paragraph, first sentence. The book is still a novel, a work of fiction and not non-fiction as implied in this section.

"According to one commentator," Why is the commentator unnamed?

ref 113- > "The Bishop of Durham, the Rt Rev Dr Tom Wright, described the novel as a "great thriller" but "lousy history"."

I feel this part of the article must be revised severely to eradicate assertions and personal POV. 81.164.202.175 09:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC) Yes, please leave the debunking out. Its inappropriate. Also, Im not sure you are allowed to simply remove valid comments from the discussion page, and I see someone has. If we enter then anti DaVinciCode comments, they must be ballanced by pro comments, and its really not the right place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lollipopfop (talk • contribs) 04:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

• • There is also a Spanish movie highly critical of Opus Dei: Camino.--85.55.199.5 (talk) 23:26, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Stjosemariagettogethermen.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Stjosemariagettogethermen.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)