Talk:Optimal tax

Untitled

While a welcome article, it sure has inadequate, subjective and silly wording right now in places. "playing at being a home chef"? Who is to say a person who cooks at home is playing at it? Some people who cook at home regardless of being rich or poor can be better or more talented than restaurant chefs. It is a matter possibly of the rich person having above all the time - not necessarily leisure time - to cook at home. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.191.147.226 (talk) 08:37, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Definition

I have looked at p. 444 in Ljungqvist and Sargent's textbook and there is nothing on optimal taxation there. The page indicated features the concluding remarks on asset pricing. Please find a proper source or change the definition accordingly. --Arbraxan (talk) 09:12, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Optimal tax/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==WP Tax Class== Stub class because one section and not enough references.EECavazos 00:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC) ==WP Tax Priority== Mid priority because a theory that may apply worldwide.EECavazos 00:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 00:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 01:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)