Talk:Optical character recognition/Archives/2014
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Evolution and evolvability in topic Language comparisons
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Optical character recognition. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Robotics attention needed
- Refs - large chunks of text have no refs
- MoS compliance checks
- Content - all topics covered?
- Reassess
Manual billing
Is it mandatory to bill electronocally now? or can we still print hcfa forms and 1500 forms to bill medical claims? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.234.70.98 (talk) 13:07, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Language comparisons
The article is largely written about latin script. It would be useful to have a section on how this compares to languages with more characters (e.g. Japanese kanji) or cursive scripts (e.g. arabic). I came across this page after reading a BBC article on digitisation of arabic documents [1]:
- 'The digitisation project has created dozens of jobs at the BL, where staff are pushing the boundaries of Optical Character Recognition software to convert typescripts and printed text into searchable files - relatively straightforward in English, but notoriously difficult in Arabic, which uses cursive letter-forms.'