Talk:Opposition to the India–United States Civil Nuclear Agreement in India
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Opposition to the India–United States Civil Nuclear Agreement in India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled
editwhich idiot wrote this page.it is completely biased and filled with grammatical errors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.211.128.98 (talk) 10:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
This article has signs of obvious bias
edit"The Left parties opposition is genuine. ...For this Nuclear Deal UPA Government is surrendering India's pride."
a. That the Left parties' opposition is genuine is obviously partisan. b. No references or published evidence for the allegation of Governmental corruption. c. "surrendering India's pride" - that's again a matter of debate, and a partisan viewpoint of opponents to the nuclear deal. This section should be deleted. Random meche (talk) 16:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Opposition to the Indo-US civilian agreement in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080219052214/http://www.indianexpress.com:80/story/239308._.html to http://www.indianexpress.com/story/239308._.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071215045640/http://www.indianexpress.com:80/story/213083.html to http://www.indianexpress.com/story/213083.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071215045643/http://www.indianexpress.com:80/story/213652.html to http://www.indianexpress.com/story/213652.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Credibility of opposition from some scientists
editI recently came across the following excerpt from the book The Accidental Prime Minister: The Making and Unmaking of Manmohan Singh by Sanjaya Baru, page number 136:
“Many retired nuclear scientists came out of the woodwork wanting to be ‘consulted’ and to be seen as part of the historic process. One such senior scientist even sent me his biodata and urged me to get him appointed as an adviser to the PM. When this did not happen, he became a severe critic of the nuclear deal.”-Sanjaya Baru
This excerpt certainly puts some question marks on the credibility of some statements by scientists on the nuclear deal. I propose that this excerpt be mentioned in the article.— Vaibhavafro 💬 13:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)