Talk:Opportuna of Montreuil

Revisions

I have made some revisions. When onme changes one's sources in order to make them believable, the result is neither good history nor intewllectual honesty. Very naughty... and thoroughly Christian, might I add? --Wetman 04:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

I agree with you, and so I'm rather confused. I wasn't really going for historical revisionism so much as trying to reconcile some very different sources. I tried to go more for ommission of details than introducing incongruities. Anyway, thanks for the insight, especially in regards to the Siege of Paris (since I would have had no idea that's what her vitae were referring to). I'm going to clean them up a bit by adding them into the "Notes" section. Alekjds ^talk 04:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

I couldn't work my notes into your format: I shall sit down now and stop rocking the boat, so you can edit. It's a general rule that the more extreme miracles and tortures in hagiographies are gracefully elided in all the versions available on the web. I haven't seen the Vita, but I'd bet the king is simply Carolus without "Bald" or "Fat". The tacit understanding is that Opportuna and her family were Carolingian nobles, as all bishops of Gaul were: should that be mentioned? --Wetman 05:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps, but it seems to me an implicit assumption with saints of this age, as I've seen that most "poor" or "common" saints are usually mentioned as being such. By the way, I had actually worked all your notes into the Notes format, but it was lost in the edit conflict. I suppose I'll just rework them as before. Alekjds ^talk 20:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Opportuna of Montreuil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.saintpatrickdc.org/ss/0422.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:54, 4 May 2016 (UTC)