 | This article was nominated for deletion on 18 February 2021. The result of the discussion was speedy delete. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from https://www.orthograph.com/the-operational-bim/. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2021021810009101. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 25 February 2021. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Notability concerns |
Contested deletion edit
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... OrthoGraph, the owner of the content in question has give a Declaration of consent via e-mail to Wikipedia.
- Thank you for your response. Please sign your additions to this Talk page using four tilde (~) characters. Paul W (talk) 18:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- The speedy deletion proposed by another editor was overturned as the apparent copyright violation was reversed by the website author allowing the content's use. I had simultaneously proposed deletion (WP:PROD} arguing that any material details about 'operational BIM' from this article could be merged into the main building information modeling article. On its own, the subject matter's notability is debatable (less than 5000 Google search engine hits), and it currently has few independent sources references (apart from a vague list of external links). Short of deletion, it requires a comprehensive rewrite to achieve an encyclopedic style. Paul W (talk) 20:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Merge edit
Per the discussion above, especially @Paul W:'s comments, I have placed merge tags on both articles. I would do the merge myself, but I have absolutely no idea what the articles are about. Jdcooper (talk) 04:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Agree Merge. Any useful and reliably sourced content from this article (Operational BIM]) should be merged into the main BIM article. This article can then be deleted / redirected to the BIM article. Will give this a couple of days to see if there is any meaningful discussion here; if not, then will be Bold per WP:AFM. Paul W (talk) 11:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)