This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
I would Oppose a merger; the subject has plenty of scope to expand, to deal with the Indian Army's operation in like manner to the page on the Air Force operation. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:20, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Merger seems to be the correct choice. It is required because this section is, in fact, a sub-section of the Article on the Kargil War. But most importantly, we also need to develop this section. This section, as it appears currently, is worthless. Circumcised (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
This comment, as it curently appears, doesn't make a lot of sense. Are you suggesting this page be merged to Kargil War, or that this page be developed? Xyl 54 (talk) 22:14, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The connection of the list of POWs to the rest of the article is not explained anywhere. Article on Kargil War does not help explain it. That it only lists Pakistani POW's seems to be a violation of NPOV. Listmeister (talk) 18:29, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply