This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from Operation Septentrion appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 March 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO articles
This article was copy edited by Lihaas, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 5:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC).Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
participants were u.s., french and afghan. operation was in afghanistan. what affiliation is there to canadian english?--71.167.157.17 (talk) 16:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
The article does not have strong ties to a particular English-speaking nation. Therefore MOS:RETAIN requires that the article consistently use the variety of English of the first non-stub revision, which happens to be Canadian English. Mathew5000 (talk) 17:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
the article asserts 200 U.S. special forces were involved. this is not a tie to a particular english-speaking nation?--71.167.157.17 (talk) 18:47, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it is a tie, but not a "strong tie" because the operation was primarily French. Wikipedia policy MOS:TIES applies when the topic of the article has "strong ties" to a particular English-speaking nation. Even though Operation Septentrion has stronger ties to the US than to any other English-speaking nation, that doesn't necessarily constitute strong ties. Mathew5000 (talk) 19:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Regarding this edit, you are misunderstanding WP:ITALIC. It provides: “Wikipedia prefers italics for phrases in other languages and for isolated foreign words”. It certainly does not say to italicize article titles, or blocks of quoted text, that happen to be in a foreign language. Mathew5000 (talk) 17:34, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
what is a title in a foreign language if not a phrase in another language?--71.167.157.17 (talk) 18:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
