Talk:Operation On-Target

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Macchess in topic Potential for Conflict of Interest

Untitled edit

The excerpt was such a small percentage of the original page that it probably falls under fair use, however, to avoid controversy, I have re-written the article from scratch on the temp page. It is still a stub, unfortunately, but I am looking for someone that knows more about this to fix it up. NThurston 01:53, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please add a suitable license for the Cloward photos on the Wikimedia pages edit

It was great to learn more about the early history of On Target, and to see the photos, but please note the warning message on the photos - since you have not provided a license, they are subject to deletion.

The discussion of licenses at Wikimedia is here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing

I would suggest one of these:

Release to public domain: (use this tag, substitute curly braces for parentheses): ((Cc-zero))

   http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Cc-0
   http://freedomdefined.org/Licenses/CC-0

Allowed for use with attribution: (use this tag, substitute curly braces for parentheses): ((Cc-by-3.0|1=))

    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Cc-by-3.0
    http://freedomdefined.org/Licenses/CC-BY

Macchess (talk) 21:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Potential for Conflict of Interest edit

Three days ago, I became an associate administrator for a website that has been externally linked by this page (Operation On-Target)by an unrelated third party eight years ago. That website is the National BSA Operation On-Target site, http://www.bsaontarget.org/. Please let me know if any of my edits appear to be a conflict of interest in light of that association. Macchess (talk) 06:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC) As co-author of part of this page I have no problem with, and actually appreciate, the link to BSA's Operation On-Target site. Clowardja (talk) 23:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply