Talk:Operation Nanook
Latest comment: 7 years ago by AtomCrusher in topic Proposed merge
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
.jpg)
Proposed merge edit
Whilst I appreciate the depth and breadth of Operation Nanook, the annual articles currently in place are by no means substantial enough to warrant their individual existence.
I've proposed a merger, and would anticipate a well-structured and informative single article to replace the disambiguation page, which will aid readers in comparing the operation year-on-year. AtomCrusher (talk) 20:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)