 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
New Tag edit
This page also lacks citations, adding a tag for that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KriticKill (talk • contribs) 21:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to keep both articles. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 00:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Battle of Remagen edit
Overlapping and duplicate articles about the same subject. — btphelps (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- Do not merge - While the article is basic, lacks citations and such, it should stand alone. It can be improved. The impact on the capture of this bridge was significant. For example, information on the capture of this bridge by two US Army participants has more details on the battle. See: Alexander A. Drabik & Karl H. Timmermann, these were the first US soldier & US officer who crossed the bridge, in effect capturing it. Even the section Ludendorff_Bridge#U.S. Capture during World War II has better details than the article Battle of Remagen. The info is out there, time is needed for some one to rewrite the article. Jrcrin001 (talk) 01:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Do not merge - There was more to LUMBERJACK then the action at Remagen. A preferable outcome would be for the combat actions of LUMBERJACK to be better described, while briefly mentioning Remagen and pointing to a link in that section of the article. W. B. Wilson (talk) 16:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Do not merge I moved the bulk of the content from Ludendorff Bridge to Battle of Remagen, substantially improving the article. Some work still needed however. I will be closing the merger in a day or two unless someone objects. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 01:45, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.