Talk:Operation Flax/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Harrison49 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 15:42, 28 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    There are links to disambiguation pages for logistic, operation and Staffel.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
    The article is well referenced.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
    The article covers the major aspects.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    The article maintains a neutral point of view.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Great work, well done. Harrison49 (talk) 23:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Done. Dapi89 (talk) 22:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply