Talk:Operation Agreement

Latest comment: 14 days ago by Keith-264 in topic Fns

SAS edit

SAS currently links to a dab page; I would guess that it should go to Special Air Service of New Zealand. Can someone who knows about this fix the link? --Pagrashtak 23:07, 19 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Casualties edit

Were the Axis losses really that low? Jmosman 13:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm rollingback, I'd like some sources cited before any figures are changed. Oberiko 23:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Count edit

The text says "seven motor torpedo boats" were lost, but the info box says "4 MTBs" and "2 MLs" which only make six.

Which is correct?

RASAM (talk) 18:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Citations edit

Added cites from the OH and replaced a couple of interweb cites; all paragraphs now have at least one citation. Keith-264 (talk) 10:53, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

I've done as much as I can without an extensive rewrite and am pressed for time so that will have to wait. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 16:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ju88 edit

@DagosNavy: Have you a source for that? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 16:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 Y Done. A typical case of "I have read it somewhere..." Best regards.----Darius (talk) 23:36, 4 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Strength ? edit

30 Germans / 30 German Guns - eh ? 30 Germans served 30 guns, or what ? Nobody noticed that, besides, also casualty number for Germans seems not that credible. --213.172.123.242 (talk) 22:15, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Information lacking ? edit

How far was Tobruk port behind Axis lines, or what time exactly landing attempts were made. "Night of 13./14. September" is a bit foggy information. --213.172.123.242 (talk) 22:17, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Fns edit

Homogenised them as sfns and tidied up editions of volumes. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 08:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply