I moved these gigantic lists from the main OpenType article because I found them really distracting there. VasileGaburici (talk) 14:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. I suggest WP:NOTTEXTBOOK means they should not be included anywhere, but transwikiing to wikibooks seems like a good idea. Ros0709 (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- The main list is dry and anyone can read it on the web at Microsoft's specification site. The only saving grace it has is that some features are linked to Wiki articles. A solution would be to move those links to the typography features page, which has a shorter list of OpenType features (that's not scheduled for deletion). As for the Mac list, I posted a question on the Mac fonts page to see if anybody there cares about it. I don't, but I didn't want to just delete it after someone spent the time to figure out what works and what doesn't.VasileGaburici (talk) 14:23, 20 July 2008 (UTC)