This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
editThis package seems to lack coverage in significant sources. Is there anything that can be done to secure its notability? Leondz (talk) 14:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
The software has many downloads from the SourceForge repository, and it is cited by several scientific papers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.18.67.48 (talk) 16:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- SourceForge is irrelevant as regards notability, and the "several scientfic papers" (if you're referring to the oblique references present on the page) don't help, either. TEDickey (talk) 16:13, 13 July 2014 (UTC)