Talk:One (Casualty)/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Soaper1234 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 12:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks for the speedy review. I shall respond to the comments ASAP. Soaper1234 - talk 19:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Some Dude From North Carolina: I believe I have responded to all your comments. Let me know if I need to do anything further. Soaper1234 - talk 13:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Is there a secondary source that can be used for the runtime?
  • Remove the comma after "television series Casualty".
  • "are trained" and "which covers" should be in past tense since this is from 2016/2017.
  • Add a comma after "Twitter hashtag".

Plot edit

  • The plot section is 397 words (without the names) so that passes MOS:TVPLOT.
  • On the other hand, are the names of each actor necessary if there's already a #Cast section?
  • Removed cast section, so would be needed. Plus, it is first occurrence of names. Soaper1234 - talk 19:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Remove the comma after "passed onto Jacob".
  • "walks in the" → "walks into the"
  • Add a comma after "Duffy, Chloe".
  • Shouldn't it be "difference in people's lives" rather than "difference to"?

Cast edit

  • Try to be consistent here and in the rest of the article between "sister Lisa" and "Sister Lisa".
  • The Instagram image doesn't exist anymore / is dead. Find a replacement or remove the claim.
  • Remove the colon after "including".
I've just removed the section as I've realised it isn't that crucial. The guest stars are already listed in the infobox and regular cast are mentioned throughout the article. Let me know if you disagree with this though. Soaper1234 - talk 19:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
I was going to comment on whether the section was necessary. Either way, great way to be bold!   Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Production edit

  • Since the episode has already aired, certain phrases in this section and in the rest of the article should be in past tense.
  • Casualty → Casualty
  • "fly on the wall" → "fly-on-the-wall"
  • Why are there three paragraphs (2-4) in this section of plot and reviews?
  • Paragraph 2 explains the format of the episode, with real-world information supporting it.
  • Paragraph 3 is real-world information about the two work experience women. I don't mind removing this paragraph if you don't feel it is needed.
  • Paragraph 4 is basically quotes about the episode explaining what the episode is designed to be; how the cast and production team envisioned the episode. Soaper1234 - talk 13:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Remove commas after "to a stage", "Duffy, Chloe", "cast, crew", and "two boom operators".
  • There was only a comma after "to a stage". Did you mean add a comma after the other three quotes? Soaper1234 - talk 13:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Soaper1234: Yeah, I meant that commas should be added after "Duffy, Chloe", and then after "cast, crew", and after "two boom operators". Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Done Soaper1234 - talk 13:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "one of production sound mixer" doesn't sound right
  • "support cast" → "support the cast"
  • "same to regular" → "same as regular"
  • "there was no cuts" → "there were no cuts"
  • "equivalent to" → "equivalent of"
  • "is billed" → "was billed"

Reception edit

  • "highest rated" → "highest-rated"
  • The uses of "which is" feel repetitive, and some are not necessary.
  • Again, some uses of "is" should be "was" since this already aired.
  • "for crew" → "for the crew"

References edit

  • Archive all archivable (either manually or with this tool).
  • Mark video references from BBC / BBC One with "url-access=registration".

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·